Chicago social enterprise


Chicago-Area Social Enterprises Will Benefit Under New Rule

Anne Field | March 5, 2018


Procurement is an often-overlooked policy tool, but it can have significant impact on local economies. Cook County, Illinois,  which includes Chicago and is the second largest county in the U.S., is using its purchasing power to give the area’s social enterprises an official leg up. The county recently enacted an ordinance giving impact ventures a preference in government procurement of goods and services. The rule, which took effect in October, was just published.

“This will help the sustainability of mission-driven social enterprises,” says Marc J. Lane, a Chicago attorney and social enterprise advocate, who drafted the ordinance. “They now will receive a preference as a matter of public policy.”

Lane, who hopes the policy will serve as a model for other municipalities, calls it “the first procurement ordinance in the nation to encourage financially self-sustaining social enterprises.”

Last year, Los Angeles County revamped its entire procurement ordinance and, in the process, chose to favor social enterprises. But the definition of such organizations was broader, including green business, as well as nonprofits with and without earned revenues, says Lane.

L3Cs and Benefit Corps

The Cook County ordinance, on the other hand, applies a much stricter definition—i.e., enterprises with earned revenue from a business that is addressing a social problem. Lane worked with the county’s chief procurement officer to pinpoint how mission-driven ventures can qualify for the preference.

The ordinance stipulates that if bids from eligible enterprises are 5% higher than the lowest offer, that venture gets the contract.  So a $100 bid would be treated as if it were $95.

Marc Lane
Cook County’s Marc Lane

Two entities are automatically eligible: L3Cs, or low-profit limited liability companies, and Benefit Corporations, which are businesses that legally can make decisions based on non-financial, societal and environmental issues.

Other for-profit or nonprofits may be eligible if they make most of their income from earned revenue, directly address social needs by selling products or services to disadvantaged people and/or employ such folks and can provide appropriate documentation of these activities.

Enterprises must also have their principal place of business and a majority of their work force located in a six-county region, including Cook. There are 50 active Benefit Corporations and 130 L3Cs in Illinois, according to Lane.

The rule also applies to enterprises that aren’t eligible for a preference under a different ordinance. So if you’re, say, a minority-owned social venture, you choose which preference you want to apply for. “You pick your poison,” says Lane. “Otherwise we wind up with an unrealistic economic situation for the county.”

Role Model

The ordinance is an initiative of the Cook County Commission on Social Innovation, a year-and-a-half-year-old entity that incubates social policy recommendations for the county. It has assembled a team drawn from “thoughts leaders in the non-profit sector, Cook County government heads of department, economic development experts and community builders.”

For Lane, the biggest impact of the ordinance will be on the supply chain. That’s because agencies sourcing goods and services from mission-driven ventures will get the stuff they need, while contributing to the financial sustainability of such businesses. “It’s doing double duty,” says Lane.

Related: Chicago Looks to Social Enterprise to Address Urban Challenges

Ultimately, the goal is to provide a model for other municipalities around the country.  The ordinance could also encourage socially-minded businesses to focus on suppliers that go beyond negative screening—for example, avoiding suppliers that use sweat shop labor—to also picking companies that are intentionally doing good. “They will choose organizations that are contributing to the communities in which they operate,” says Lane.


Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply